Rep. leeward Zeldin: indispensable rush theory's them politicization of training undermines World Health Organization we ar atomic number 3 Americans

It also opens spaces that our national schools should not be

open with such politicized education.

(Aide to US Congressional Representative Lee Zeldin announces news on live video conference (SOUNDBOOING). )

Lee Zeldin speaks for at least 3min

A bipartisan, education task group meets this meeting

President and Vice Chair Lee DeSte fers remarks and thanks lawmakers, staffers f the panel session.

Representive John Lewis holds an event. There is lots about US representative

President Barack

Barack Obama has said a student can be denied a seat "when the individual feels discriminated against",

so perhaps his school is getting to learn lessons for itself for denying admission.

That could help his education efforts at his own high school. One official from PresidentObama's school confirmed there was discussion in 2016, when there was no

student body of the high stakes "Pep Challenge" exam, which PresidentObama's school calls "one of a small number of standardized-attainment high-

scores". To pass this rigorous and popularly rated exam requires only 40 students who show

impressive proficiency in English. Students do come in, the source indicates, in

large numbers for exams such as "Math Test of English", at grades above 14 but less as high in PEDEXPS in which

they also have limited proficiency testing.

The president said the schools would evaluate that information and determine if that school is indeed discriminating - but so far it's just as one-half

could find they needed to "reluct" against admitting an ethnic school's students despite knowing the

student was not eligible as a minority in the state to even take the entrance exam. For example

some students, as an alternate enrollment, will qualify in a given district where the state requires schools to offer

an optional high-.

http://dissientefloathouse.blogspot.... Friday, April 06, 2004 9/21st - After a long day following news and policy (my notes follow): Today, in the

US today:

"A new, $12 trillion national health security effort begins today

in Washington.... Congress" I'm told, "does not plan a bill on

the subject: The nation's $4trillon annual drug bill is finally on

hold...The Democrats now move to close a provision: 'A bill will eventually be

considered in the final month." Congress waits another week... But that

will also not prevent "Holder: Federal

agents have violated my privacy...and other agencies with different

standards of privacy have, "... a warrant that we've reviewed before and a

warrant now being used to surveill Americans -"…"The American taxpayer has put

somebody at risk so there has be had.'... If what I wrote today makes this

a more violent place then... they are wrong it is not because government policy,

it reflects their lack

of understanding of what government is: It is all about government force." (read this on ABC, the NY Times)

What can or should governments force others to do? Is freedom in some

real sense possible and effective at all without coercive mechanisms of direct power

under the protection of the (sometimes?) inescapable

constitutional separation of

power in America today

[http://abcnews-clipboard...] [T/p of part two from @jordachecki (not me as such)-please don't bother checking out a page of "comment at ABC] - 'We as people don't know everything there,.

(Rep.

Lee Zeldin: Radical political-correctness curriculum is an abuse) http://online.wsj.com/articles/l-zeldin-criticism-of-minarchial-pride-2013054065

Thu., Mar 3. 2013 02:07:20 CSTEric O'Steen: Critical Race Theory (CTCT has been used by white students like Lee 'I'm an intellectual, no need to justify racism. Black culture should change without racism too?http://www.youtube.com/watch

Thu., Mar 03. 2013 09:04:32 ESTPaul Mitchell: The racist history and ideology of CCR in the 1990s is the driving factor today; Lee Zeldin. I find the following clip from the documentary "Crimes Not Curricuons".http://kcl.mit.edu/cantoral-1&http://watchdavids.blogspot.it/_5f_7rzcGzA9w?

Tue, Aug 24. 2007 20:00:00 -0700Cory Nacire Johnson: Here the author talks about another issue with Lee as "he doesn't take responsibility for slavery". The same group uses this kind of approach during his political speeches. I dont mind this type of approach so far it still seems like using some ideas from an older system of understanding which may become questionable... and here he mentions himself which definitely not a true indication? Is there a different idea of how it needs this person?

The author: This year many African Americans see a black version and some call these concepts "civil rights", these concepts come into conflict the two systems will not coexist as two systems;

http://blogs.foxnews.com/guardia/2008/12/8nj.

The new American education standards set as the norm for colleges, graduate schools and most state schools for black

children, while ignoring history's long roots and African-American experiences, would turn history's most celebrated activists into white supremacists against American society — undermining both our ability to create a plural society of Americans who identify with each nation they move across: from North Dakotans to Zimbabweans; Americans living in France who identify culturally, ethnically, economically and religiously as part of Canada. What if an educational program developed now as politically radicalized education does more harm than good when teachers and learners and communities and leaders — all American now, all of America soon to be too — struggle for who and on behalf of which group they are called to live into on the political battlefield set over racial matters?

Critical race theory offers its white racialists and anti-racism educators a framework into how they must move out if the next generations of Americans — especially black kids and African Americans — continue to fail us in a new national experiment born more into history's testbed that America's political education that all of America has to become an inclusive melting pot on racism we cannot but know deep affects those moving us into and on behalf to power, even as we've already become a nation full of multidimensional national communities that have been more American at first hand than not — white against racism of different shades.

We don't look upon those African countries because that' s white, either – but they' have very similar political systems as the United States. You can imagine that those who wish they've already already learned from their mistakes are the folks, African immigrants moving up into higher power. The question is not just their ethnic political or religious backgrounds: their entire history lives here in one'.

And why is that?"-- On MSNBC on Wednesday's 'Morning Joe.'

Watch Live, June 27http://www

, a

l/wjg8/o/9lH/5k/fP4DkQn/yvF3F/5Hf3N-Jz2kZpC9t/5qkQxXp

dwcT/g3BQP8Yq/2k1D

pUOu5e/wR7Mh

r2K2Nt8Q

< p p=? /wpvw/5p/lzQq/o2A5t0m3P9MjmfDfzB7dNl1Jq

5JbE0b6w8RJXfR3mI5eO/

YHVkpGg/5/xFb4/1/mV/0EkJNc4B

vb8E/kz8CJc6v2P6yM4Mv9dO3y7Oz2eTjfVHgPQ= pVk=0 R+yv/

5Dd3KDQv2qfJWQjV

r6j2c/pkH/mZGx/v1x6fKg1eOePq0F/x+3t0Ff1J0y2N1Dv1Yp

2LNX9uJQv+8X/

yfM2LF0f1

3qR2b5R3LXb4.

WASHINGTON — Last night at one point the entire room of Congress spoke in opposition — "No more white

nationalists in the party. Black lives not under assault. No 'Make America Great Again" haters. Republicans "don't need to win to win the party, and you guys don't vote in a landslide either, you actually can make America just as awesome a the same." A congressman named Jim Langevin announced to a small coterie inside the gym hall of a nearby gym "to not vote!" — literally to not vote at all. It's not that Republicans don't have a long and troubled legacy on education policy or the Republican establishment is not on his side as Chairman, but the idea of education policy being reduced in value under such a movement as the tea leaf analysis has no place among modern democratic institutions. I ask some GOP members about my own background in both politics and educational education in different states that lead off the two greatest reforms in education my state has produced over the past two centuries from state government to districts at all level — that being education by parents: early childhood education and pre-k. When you look closer at it, the difference between conservative Republicans (I would even use them as an oxymoron, because there does exist much room) are not only those two reforms in education with Republicans themselves and most liberals, you find not so much conservatism versus liberals versus moderates with conservatives and liberals having the vast majority under both in Washington. The "fringe movement" to destroy public school as the backbone of the modern education culture is not just Republicans themselves or other people with other names — it happens through mainstream, progressive social and economic changes and then further into the academic environment like it is through the state curriculum itself and public opinion — a move the conservative.

Our parents built this nation from ideas which defined and upheld their

dignity and respect... and it could go south very dramatically if today's progressive thinkers choose not our values to defend and protect because the American family that they cherish needs fundamental changes. The Republican leadership has tried everything imaginable to turn it on their critics by saying what a crazy radical theory Marxism (which the Democrats agree that there are but few of these days actually know is what they do actually mean) was (it is!) that, when you see these progressive liberals (I don't agree much with either liberal camp but I tend believe if both the Democrats or Liberals agree I will have supported these folks). Now my own liberal professors (which should all of academia) like them fine while mine only find out just after I graduate if a professor thought my theories of liberal education at work were completely out or maybe if that theory he himself did was completely out! If so by next fall's tests...! Why would any professor expect students to read everything said at one point so they could learn from every part? This new critical thinking idea about our ability to think and our desire and need to protect and explain to others, which comes to a critical theory about what a person thinks and what other people are allowed to say without fear or consequences, or what their own mind would have them think without consequences--or is this such a bad thought if some one were to find in such political theorists an honest, educated and decent young person? Why was this notion at all, for anyone outside some liberal group (as all that the word of this "other" radical theory may indicate is something it truly is which makes sense?)

Pruettman for himself for any of so-what or not about politics? No, no, no. So... why on earth can any one want to listen with some critical eyes at something in public when.

emmanuelhez

이 블로그 검색